The petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and interlocutory orders, if any, are vacated.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
W.P.NO.20748 OF 2019
O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Rajasheker Reddy)
Sri Gaddam Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that
he has instructions from his client to withdraw the writ petition, and therefore,
seeks permission for the same.
Permission accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.
Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order
as to costs.
---------------------------------------------
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
-----------------------------------------------
P.NAVEEN RAO,J
DATE:18—10—2019
AVS
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
P.NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
