Petitioner challenged inaction by respondent authorities regarding unauthorized temple construction on earmarked apartment land. Court directed Respondent No. 2 to redress the grievance and communicate action taken within two weeks.
Respondent No. 2 directed to redress the petitioner's grievance and communicate action taken within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 20415 of 2019
O R D E R:
In this writ petition, petitioner’s grievance is inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 4 on his complaint dated 15.07.2019 alleging that respondent No.6 is making construction of a Temple in the land earmarked for Janapriya Uthopiya Apartments Complex, Upparpally, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without obtaining any permission from the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of Sections 428 and 452 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, no construction shall be made without permission. He further submits that on the complaint of the petitioner, a notice was sent on 05.09.2019, however, to a wrong person, instead of respondent No.6.
Learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5 submits that necessary action would be taken by the respondent authorities after issuing a notice to respondent No.6, who is allegedly making construction of the Temple without permission.
Recording the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to redress the grievance of the petitioner and communicate to him the action taken thereon within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
2
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Dt:23.09.2019 kdl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent authorities are in violation of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act by failing to grant permission for temple construction.
Whether to direct the respondent authority to redress the petitioner's grievance regarding unauthorized temple construction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 to 4
Respondent No. 6
Respondent No. 2
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
