The single judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner had attained the age of superannuation, rendering the cause not maintainable.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; pending misc. applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.20007 of 2005
ORDER:
Counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, as the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation, and the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of above said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J
22nd January, 2019
ajr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication after the petitioner attained the age of superannuation.
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
