Single judge disposed of a writ petition aggrieved by inaction in disposing of a Land Transfer Record (LTR) case. The court directed the respondent to dispose of the case within three months after notice and hearing.
The 3rd respondent is directed to dispose of the LTR case within three months after notice and hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.NO.18081 OF 2019
O R D E R
Aggrieved by the inaction of the 3rd respondent – Agency Divisional Officer / Sub Collector, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, in disposing of the LTR case in Rc.No.A/1037/2015/60, filed by the petitioner, the present writ petition is filed.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to dispose of the above referred LTR case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice and opportunity of hearing to all the affected parties.
Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
--------------------------------------- A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
DATE:12—09—2019
avs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct disposal of a land transfer record case pending with the respondent authority.
Petitioner
3rd Respondent
A.Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
