Allowed

Gajula Pothanna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Feb 2019WP/1617/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by a petitioner who purchased land in an unapproved layout and sought building permission. The Court directed the respondent municipality to accept the application for building permit under a specific GHMC circular dated 19.04.2017, allowing consideration of such plots upon payment of penalization charges and fees.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent municipality to accept the petitioner's application for building permission in terms of the Circular U.O.No.B/1545/TPS/CCP/HO/GHMC/2016/485.

Gajula Pothanna Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.1617 OF 2019

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

Heard Sri Polisetty Radhakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-Municipality.

¶4

According to the petitioner, he purchased an extent of 266.66 square yards of open plot bearing No.353, in Survey No.1108/3 of Nirmal Town, Adilabad District, Telangana State, for a valuable consideration vide registered sale deed bearing document dated 12.02.2016. It is also the case of the petitioner herein that his vendor is having title by way of title deed issued by the revenue authorities prior to the cut off date 28.10.2015, as fixed in G.O.Ms.No.151, dated 02.11.2015 and the revenue authorities also issued title deed and pattadar passbook in respect of the said land.

¶5

Admittedly, the petitioner herein purchased the plot in an unapproved layout. The grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is that the respondent – authorities are not accepting the application of the petitioner for grant of building permission on the ground that the subject plot falls under unapproved layout and is not recognized within the scheme introduced by the first respondent vide G.O.Ms.No.151, dated 02.11.2015.

¶6

During the course of arguments, it is brought to the notice of the Court that the Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, in respect of unapproved layouts, issued Circular U.O.No.B/1545/TPS/CCP/HO/GHMC/2016/485, dated 19/24.04.2017

¶7

¶8

and a copy of the same is placed on record by the learned counsel for

¶9

petitioner as material paper and the said Memo reads as under:

¶10

“Building permission in such plots/sites may be considered by the Competent Authority (HMDA/GHMC) by collecting basis penalization charges as per LRs – 2015 and 33% compounding fee on the same plus open space contribution charges (14%) on the present market value of the site/plot applied for Building Permission”

¶11

It is very much evident from the above circular that the applications for building permissions can be considered by the competent authorities by collecting 33% compounding fee on the same plus open space contribution charges at 14% on the market value of the plot applied for building permission. The Government issued the said memo in respect of the plots/sites, for which no application under Land Regularization Scheme was submitted. It is also very much evident from the reading of the above memo that the building application of the petitioner herein deserves to be considered in terms of the said circular dated 19/24/04/2017 subject to compliance of statutory requirements.

¶12

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent – municipality to accept the application of the petitioner herein for building permission in terms of the Circular U.O.No.B/1545/TPS/CCP/HO/GHMC/2016/485, dated 19/24.04.2017 issued by the Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and pass appropriate orders, as per law. No order as to costs.

¶13

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶14

______________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J

¶15

01.02.2019 vhb

¶16

¶17

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶18

WRIT PETITION No.1617 OF 2019

¶19

Dated : 01.02.2019

¶20

vhb

Gajula Pothanna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajula Pothanna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. P. Laxmi Narsamma Vs The State of Telangana

Padigela Naresh Vs The State of Telangana

C.Satyanarayana Vs State of Telangana

S. Ram Koteshwar Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Anusha Rathod Vs The State of Telangana

S Prasad Vs the State of Telangana