Tenanted possession of secured asset was permitted to continue until 30.9.2019 on the basis of petitioner's undertaking and respondent's consent, with possession to be surrendered thereafter.
Petitioner permitted to remain in occupation of the subject tenanted premises till 30.9.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1563 of 2019
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
The petitioner claims to be a tenant in occupation of the secured asset owned by respondent No.2 herein. She is aggrieved by the proceedings initiated by Edelweiss Housing Finance Limited, the secured creditor, to take possession of the said tenanted premises under the provisions of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 ( for short, 'the SARFAESI Act’).
SK, J & PKR, J W.P.No.1563 of 2019 Dt:15.7.2019
2
Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.
________________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
________________________ JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO
15th July, 2019 dr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner could be granted extension of time to vacate the tenanted possession of secured asset pursuant to SARFAESI Act
Whether the undertaking of petitioner to relocate within a specified period ought to be accepted by the court
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Edelweiss Housing Finance Limited
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.5
Sanjay Kumar
P.Keshava Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
