A writ petition alleging inaction by municipal authorities regarding unauthorized construction was dismissed as it became maintainable less after a building permission was granted and a violation notice was issued, leaving disputed facts for appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.14267 OF 2019
Date:15.07.2019
Between:
Mohd. Minhajuddin, S/o. Dr. Mohd Riyazuddin, aged 41 years, R/o.D.No.12-2-717/1/72, Saptagiri Colony, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad and another
.. Petitioners
And
The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), Office At Tank Bund, Hyderabad and others
.. Respondents
The Court made the following:
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.14267 OF 2019
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) for respondents 1 to 4.
3
4
The Court is not inclined to enter into other aspects and leave it open to the petitioners to agitate in appropriate proceedings.
P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date:15.07.2019
KH
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the cause in the writ petition survives for adjudication after notice was issued by the authorities.
Whether the writ court can enter into disputed questions of fact regarding unauthorized construction.
Whether the petitioners can avail appropriate remedies after the writ petition is dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Minhajuddin
The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
