Held this writ petition premature as final decree proceedings for partition remain pending before the trial court; the petitioner must apply in civil court for protection rather than approach this court.
No writ relief granted; dismissal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.11710 OF 2019
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.
the unofficial respondents in the revenue records. However, as the final decree proceedings are pending, the name of the petitioner also cannot be reflected in the revenue records. It is always open to the petitioner, being the plaintiff in the suit, to file an appropriate application to protect her interest. As the cause in the writ petition is premature and the final decree proceedings are pending before the competent civil Court, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner.
costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________
P.NAVEEN RAO, J
August 05, 2019
KTL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking protection from mutation proceedings is maintainable when final decree proceedings for partition are pending before the civil court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent Authorities
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
