Chitoor district of Andhra Pradesh, but granules produced by the said company is found in the said address. Further, though Jhass Agrl Sciences factory address is the same, but chemistry records, chemistry of machinery and glass wears were not found nor analytical procedures were observed to make the bio-products. Similarly, though M/s.Kinolac Bio Life Sciences factory address is the same, but no production activity was noticed. The samples of bio-products were collected and sent them to laboratory for testing. 9. In the counter-affidavit deposed by the incumbent Commissioner of Agriculture, it is alleged that packing of bioproduct is not having analytical procedure. Manufacturing activity is being undertaken in violation of the directions of the learned single Judge and that firms have not maintained sales and purchase registers and failed to produce source of purchase of bioproducts/ raw-materials. What is noted in the panchanama is also reiterated in the counter-affidavit. In addition, it is also contended that in the year 2013, bio-product samples drawn from M/s. Jhass Agri Sciences was found laced with insecticide and action is being taken by the concerned Insecticide Inspector for violating the Act, 1968. These contentions of the respondents are not denied by the petitioners. 10. As briefly noted above, in the judgment of the learned single Judge, dated 10.07.2015, and the Division Bench judgment in W.A.Nos.1122 and 1236 of 2016, the power to inspect and to take consequential steps are held to be valid. Inspection and taking consequential steps are for the purpose of finding out as to whether any bio-product claimed to have been manufactured and/or marketed is laced with pesticides which would be harmful
