In this revision under Article 227 challenging a trial court's evidence admission, the court held that since the trial court examined the document and concluded it was original, no interference is warranted. The petition was dismissed.
The revision petition was dismissed and pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
CRP. No.489 of 2019
ORDER:
This Revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dt.26.11.2018 passed in O.S. No.74 of 2009 by the Junior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy.
costs.
closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 16.04.2019. LSK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial Court's conclusion that the presented document was original and admissible requires interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
