Allowed

Thangaraju Marappan v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Jul 2019CRLP/1111/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice G. Sri Devi allowed a Criminal PIL under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings in a special court at Khammam. Based on a recorded compromise between the petitioners (accused) and the scheme representative, the Court quashed the case against Accused Nos. 11 to 15.

What did the court decide?

The proceedings in S.C.No.93 of 2018 against Accused Nos.11 to 15 were quashed.

Thangaraju Marappan Vs The State of Telangana — Caste Atrocities | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶2

I.A.NOs.2 AND 3 OF 2019

¶3

IN/AND

¶4

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1111 OF 2019

¶5

ORDER:

¶6

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the proceedings in S.C.No.93 of 2018 on the file of the Special Sessions Judge for Trail of Cases under SCs & STs (POA) Act Court at Khammam. A charge sheet came to be filed against the petitioners/accused Nos.11 to 15 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r), 3(2)(va) of SCs. & STs (POA) Amendment Act, 2015.

¶7

During pendency of the Criminal Petition, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2019 came to be filed by the second respondent to record the compromise and to compound the offences. Along with the petitions, a joint memo came to be filed, inter alia , stating that at the intervention of elders and well wishers, the parties have settled their disputes in terms of the compromise. The said joint memo has been supported by the affidavit of the second respondent.

¶8

Today, both the parties are present before this Court and they were identified by their respective counsel. This Court, when examined, both the parties have stated that at the instance of the elders, they have settled the matter out of the Court and the second respondent has no objection for quashing the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.11 to 15.

¶9

¶10

In the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the compromise memo filed by both the parties is recorded and I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2019 are ordered.

¶11

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of compromise, and the proceedings in S.C.No.93 of 2018 on the file of the Special Sessions Judge for Trail of Cases under SCs & STs (POA) Act Court at Khammam, against the present petitioners/accused No.11 to 15 are hereby quashed.

¶12

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand

¶13

closed.

¶14

_________________
(G. SRI DEVI, J)
10 th July 2019
RRB

Thangaraju Marappan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thangaraju Marappan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinesh Narsayya Vemul Vs The State of Telangana

Kalvala Chandrashekar , Chandu Vs The State of Telangana

Dnc Infrastructure Private Limited Vs the State of Telangana

Penugonda Jaya Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Farooq Ali, Hyd., Vs State of Ap., Rep. Pp. and Anr.

Sri Koutam Kumara Swamy, Vs The State of Telangana