The single-judge bench closed a contempt case alleging disobedience of a survey direction in a property dispute. No legal issues were formally argued; the case was disposed of due to pendency of civil suits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No. 539 of 2017
ORDER:
The present Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the respondents have willfully and deliberately disobeyed the order dated 27.02.2017 passed in W.P.No.2818 of 2017.
Today fifth respondent is present. His presence is dispensed with.
Learned Government Pleader for Revenue (TG), by producing a memo dated 03.04.2017, says that no further survey was conducted in view of pendency of the civil suits. He further submits that the writ petition itself was disposed of directing the respondents to conduct survey and if the parties are aggrieved, they can approach the civil Court. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedies according to law.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_______________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
02.04.2019 gkv
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No. 539 of 2017
Date: 02.04.2019
gkv
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
