A contempt petition alleging violation of court orders was dismissed. The court held that the alleged violation did not pertain to any court order, leading to closure of the case and associated miscellaneous applications, preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the underlying proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.357 of 2019
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of orders passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in WP.No.45082 of 2018, dated 12-12-2018.
Learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court in the writ petition, the case of the petitioner was considered and rejected vide proceedings dated 14-02-2019. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the same, I do not see any violation of orders passed by this Court.
Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. However, it is open for the petitioner to challenge the said proceedings in accordance with law. As a sequel to the disposal of this case, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
04-04-2019
Nvl
2
3
A.Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
