Court disposed of contempt petition alleging violation of writ order, noting it cannot examine merits of respondents subsequent action, granting liberty to challenge rejection order.
Contempt case disposed of; liberty granted to petitioner to challenge the order of rejection in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.C.No.174 of 2019
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed alleging violation of orders passed in WP.No.41054 of 2018, dated 15-112018.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue basing on the counter affidavit submits that in pursuance of orders passed in the writ petition, respondents have considered the case of petitioner and issued proceedings in Memo in File No.B/1225/2018, dated 18-03-2019 and complied with the order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only after filing contempt case wantonly, respondents have rejected the case of the petitioner.
In this case, it is to be seen that this Court cannot examine the merits and demerits of the order passed by the respondents.
In view of the same, contempt case is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications if any shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
18-10-2019
Nvl
2
3
Petitioner
Respondents
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
