The writ petitioner filed submissions stating that the Writ Petition had become infructuous due to compliance of interim orders passed earlier. The Court recorded the submissions and disposed of the petition accordingly without further orders.
Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Writ Petition no.8208 of 2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submits that in view of the compliance of the interim orders, dated 14.03.2018, of this Court passed in I.A.nos.1 & 2 of 2018 no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition.
Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________
M.SEETHARAMA MURTI, J
01.08.2018
RAR
Writ petitioner
M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
