The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the representation that the cause did not survive. Liberty was granted to pursue remedies on arising of new cause of action. Interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.7891 of 2006
ORDER:
Sri M.B.N. Srinivas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned counsel for the petitioners, represents that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and as such it has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is given to the petitioners to pursue the remedies available under law as and when new cause of action arises. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. ____________________________ JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO
Date: 16.02.2018. ES
Vedula Venkataramana
P. Keshava Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
