A.E.Leeladharan.,Secunderabad v. Chairman.,Rail Bhavan.,New Delhi
Telangana HCWP/6721/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Court noticed that the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 6721 of 2003 had expired. Consequently, the Writ Petition along with any miscellaneous petitions pending was closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
¶2
WRIT PETITION No. 6721 OF 2003
¶3
ORDER :
¶4
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the Counsel for the
¶5
petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired.
¶6
- In view of the above, Writ Petition is accordingly closed.
¶7
- The Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
¶8
_________________________________
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J
19th November, 2018
GS
Coram
AI extract
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/6721/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M.Pentaiah, Karimnagar District. Vs the Regional Manager, Apsrtc, Karimnagar Dist and Another
P.C.Christopher, Visakhapatnam. Vs the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
T.D.P.Kumar, Miyapur, Hyderabad District Vs the Depot Manager, Apsrtc, Miyapur,R.R.District and 2 Others
P.Fakruddin, Kurnool Dist, Vs the Regional Manager, Kurnool Dist and 2 Others