Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

P.Giri Babu Vs The Principal Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2018)

Home
Telangana HC
2018
P.Giri Babu Vs The Principal SecretaryP.Giri Babu v. The Principal Secretary

Dismissed

P.Giri Babu v. The Principal Secretary

Telangana HC17 Dec 2018WP/6418/2013

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

SMT. JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI WRIT…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

WRIT PETITION No. 6418 OF 2013

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed to declare local publication made in extraordinary gazette dated 18-02-2013 by respondent No. 3 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the lease period of the petitioners in the subject shops for a further period of three years.

As seen from the counter affidavit, the petitioners submitted representations requesting for renewal of lease for a further period of three years from 01-10-2011 and the said request was placed before standing committee and the standing committee rejected the same. Accordingly, notice was served on the petitioners on 30-12-2011 to vacate the subject shops. Challenging the said notice asking the petitioners to vacate the subject shops, the petitioners filed W.P.No. 13308 of 2012 and an interim direction was passed in the said Writ Petition while observing that it is open to the petitioners to participate in the auction and in case they emerge as the highest bidders or if they agree to pay the amount that is fetched as the highest bid, they shall be entitled to be granted fresh lease.

When the matter came up for admission on 05-03-2013, learned standing counsel for respondent No. 3-corporation submitted that pursuant to the interim direction in W.P.No. 13308 of 2012, auction was already conducted.

2

In view of the said submission made by learned standing counsel, no further orders are necessary in the Writ Petition.

The Writ Petition is accordingly closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No costs.

___________________________ KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J.

17-12-2018 JSK

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Petitioners
respondent
Corporation (Respondent No. 3)

Coram

AI extract

Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 17 Dec 2018 · December
Registered: 4 Mar 2013
Case no.: WP/6418/2013
CNR: HBHC010317522013
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi
Disposal: CLOSED NO COSTS

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi

Pothuru Satynarayana Vs The Chief Medical Officer
15 Dec 2018
M/s. Balakrishna Mining Company, Vs The Government of India
15 Dec 2018
S. Jayanthi, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to
15 Dec 2018
Jaggapu Venkata Rao, S/o late Chinnappa Rao Vs The Commissioner
17 Dec 2018
M/s. Supreme Enterprises, Vs The Commissioner
17 Dec 2018
K.Sujatha Rao Vs The Commissioner
17 Dec 2018

Cite this judgement

P.Giri Babu v. The Principal Secretary, WP/6418/2013 (TEL), decided on 17 December 2018.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi

Parties & counsel