In writ petition No. 6080 of 2006, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous after the learned counsel for petitioners stated lack of instructions, relying on a prior Government Order regarding lapse.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO
WRIT PETITION N0. 6080 OF 2006
ORDER:
Ms. P.V. Aparna Lakshmi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that she has no instructions from the petitioners.
Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that no cause would survive in the writ petition, by virtue of lapse of G.O.Ms.No.455 Revenue (UC-I) Department, dated 29.7.2002.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the writ petition shall stand closed.
JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO
Date: 02.02.2018 slk
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
P. KESHAVA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
