Petitioner challenged the Tribunal's refusal to grant interim suspension of withdrawal of in-charge arrangements. The High Court held that in-charge arrangement is not promotion and the writ petition is not maintainable for interim relief, dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3The Hon’ble Sri Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and
The Hon’ble Sri Justice M. GANGA RAO
+ WRIT PETITION No.529 OF 2018
% Date:04.01.2018
Between:
Dr. C.K. Ramesh Kumar S/ o.C. Kistappa, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Working as Director In-charge, Insurance Medical Services, (under order of change of place as In-Charge), D.No.18-4-5; 2nd lane, Kedareswara Peta, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
… Petitioner
Vs.
$ The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Labour, Employmetn, Training & Factories (IMS) Department, A.P. Secretariat, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District and others.
... Respondents
! Counsel for Petitioner : M/ s.P. Harinatha Gupta
^ Counsel for Respondents : G.P. for Services (AP)
< Gist :
> Head Note :
? Cases Referred : Nil
VRS,J & MGR,J WP No.529 of 2018
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.529 OF 2018
ORDER: (per V. Ramasubramanian, J)
Aggrieved by the refusal of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal to grant an interim suspension of the withdrawal of the InCharge arrangements earlier granted to the petitioner, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition.
VRS,J & MGR,J WP No.529 of 2018
3
exactly identical contents, and only one G.O. contains a variation. Therefore, these are issues that the Tribunal can take note of at the time of final disposal. Refusal to grant interim relief in such cases, cannot be gone into in this writ petition.
shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
______
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
M. GANGA RAO, J
January 04, 2018
KTL
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition can be entertained to challenge the refusal of interim suspension of withdrawal of in-charge arrangement.
Whether the Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief in this specific case can be corrected by the High Court.
Dr. C.K. Ramesh Kumar
The State of Andhra Pradesh
V. Ramasubramanian
M. Ganga Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
