A single-paragraph order disposing of a writ petition challenging interference with possession of land. The court directed respondents not to dispossess the petitioner without due process of law pending appeal.
Directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following due process of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.45126 of 2018
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment over the subject land to an extent of Ac.4.00 cents, situated in Sy.No.458 of Tiruchanoor Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue on instructions submits that the respondents are pursuing appeal filed by them against Judgment and Decree dated 13.11.2015 in OS.No.242/2011 and that the respondents are not interfering with the subject land of the petitioner.
Recording the aforesaid submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following due process of law. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 20.12.2018 tk
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court should direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner without following due process of law.
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
