Petitioners filed a writ challenging a acquisition notice for omitting their interest. The court granted liberty to apply for compensation enhancement under Section 3(G)(5) before disposing the Writ Petition.
Liberty granted to file an application for reference to the Arbitrator to determine a higher claim for compensation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.41940 OF 2018
DATED :04.12.2018
Between :
Mrs. Uppada Krishnaveni, W/o.Uppada Venkata Ramana Murthy, Aged about 37 yrs, Occu : Housewife, R/o.H.No.Plot No.34/E, C.B.Colony, Vizianagaram 535 003 & others.
.. Petitioners
And
The Competent Authority-RDO, Vizianagaram, Dist. Vizianagaram, PIN 535 003, A.P. & another.
.. Respondents
This court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.41940 OF 2018
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition for respondent No.1 and learned Standing counsel for respondent No. 2.
__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J
4th December, 2018 Rds
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the notice under the National Highways Act, 1956 was illegal for omitting interested persons.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Uppada Krishnaveni & others
The Competent Authority-RDO, Vizianagaram
National Highways Authority
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
