Disposed

Borlakunta Kistaiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Dec 2018WP/40358/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the Writ Petition after recording the Station House Officer’s written instructions denying interference in a civil land dispute. The Court directed police authorities not to interfere with such civil disputes unless permissible by law.

What did the court decide?

Police authorities not to interfere with civil disputes unless permissible by law; miscellaneous petitions disposed of; no order as to costs.

Borlakunta Kistaiah Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI

¶2

W .P.No.4 0 3 5 8 of 2 0 1 8

¶3

ORDER : -

¶4

When the matter is taken up, the written instructions furnished by the Station House Officer, Tiryani Police Station, Komuram Bheem Asifabad District, dated 09.11.2018, are placed on record by the learned Government Pleader. The said instructions read as under: -

¶5

“It is submitted that the petitioners are not required in connection with any cases that are pending with Tiryani Police Station till the date. The unofficial respondents 4 and 5 have also of the given any complaint against the petitioner as of now. Hence, question of calling the petitioners to the Police Station or interfering with the affairs between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents herein does not arise. The Tiryani Police are not interfering in civil disputes as alleged by the petitioners.

¶6

The allegation that the Police are not allowing the petitioners to enter into the lands in Sy.No.54 to an extent of Ac.4.13 gts., situated at Duggapur village, Tiryani Mandal, Komuram Bheem Asifabad District, is not correct and hereby denied. It is false to state that the Police are interfering into the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. It is denied that if the petitioners enter into the said lands, they will be implicated in false criminal cases. It is submitted that the allegations made in the affidavit against the Triyani Police are false, baseless and concocted. There is no iota of truth in the said allegations. The allegation that the Police are calling the petitioners and directing them not to enter into the land and not

¶7

¶8

to harvest the cotton crop is false, baseless and hereby denied. The Police have not called the petitioners and not directed them to enter into the land at the instance of the 4^th respondent as alleged in the affidavit. The said allegation has been made only for the purpose of the Writ Petition. It is submitted that the Police are also not trying to evict the petitioners from the subject land as alleged in the affidavit.”

¶9

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, by placing on record the said instructions furnished by the Station House Officer, Tiryani Police Station, Komuram Bheem Asifabad District, dated 09.11.2018, with a further direction to the respondentPolice authorities not to interfere with the civil disputes unless the same is permissible in accordance with law.

¶10

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶11

A.V.Sesh a Sai, J

¶12

Date: 21.12.2018 smr

Borlakunta Kistaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Borlakunta Kistaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Urban Mahila Development Society Vs Union of India

Rahul Medical and Services Society Vs Union of India

Cherupalli Kavyasri Vs The State of Telangana

Udthuri Shayam Sunder Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

Marupakala srisailum Vs The State of Telangana

Challa Suresh Babu Vs State of Andhra Pradesh