Single bench order dismissing the writ petition as wholly unnecessary in light of identical issues raised by the guarantor in W.P.No.40975 of 2017. No order as to costs.
Writ Petition dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
WRIT PETITION NO.35448 OF 2016
ORDER: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Sri L.Ravi Chander, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, would fairly state that, since all the substantive questions regarding violation of the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“the SARFAESI Act” for brevity) and the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, have been raised in W.P.No.40975 of 2017 filed by the guarantor, it is wholly unnecessary for this Court to examine the contentions raised in this Writ Petition on its merits; and this Writ Petition may be closed.
In the light of the submission put forth by the learned Senior Counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
_______________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
__________________________________ (KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J)
26th September 2018 RRB
Petitioner
Respondent
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
