Writ petition filed for habeas corpus directed at respondents 2 and 3 to produce the alleged detenu Mr. B. Chandra Shekar. The court found the petition infructuous as the detenu was lawfully remanded to judicial custody after arrest.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Petition No.3404 of 2018
DATED:14-02-2018
Between:
B. Savita … Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad and others … Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PEITITONER: Mr. Y. Narasimhulu, for Mr. V. Raghunath COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS: Asst. Govt. Pleader attached to the Office of the Advocate General (TS)
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CVNR, J & GSP, J WP 3404/2018
2
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy)
This writ petition is filed for issue of habeas corpus directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to produce Mr. B. Chandra Shekar, S/o. B. Bikshapathi (“the alleged detenu”) before the Court and hand over his custody to the petitioner.
Respondent No.2 filed a counter affidavit wherein he has inter alia averred that the alleged detenu is accused in Crime No.133 of 2018 registered for the offences under Sections 409 and 420 IPC and Section 24 of the Immigration Act, 1983 of L.B. Nagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate. That in connection with the said crime, he was arrested by the L.B. Nagar Police on 2.2.2018 at Kamineni X Roads, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, that after complying with the formalities of arrest, he was produced before the II Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, on the same day and that the learned Magistrate remanded him to judicial custody. It is further stated that in pursuance of the remand order, the alleged detenu is lodged in Central Prison, Cherlapally.
In the light of the above averments, which remained uncontroverted, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
__________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
___________________________ GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J 14-2-2018 bnr
CVNR, J & GSP, J WP 3404/2018
3
B. Savita
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
