The court dismissed the writ petition because the petitioner has an available alternate remedy of appeal under Section 53 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1988.
Disposal of Writ Petition with liberty to avail appeal under Section 53 of A.P. Shops & Establishments Act, 1988.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.33278 OF 2018
ORDER:
Aggrieved by the action of the 2nd respondent in filing the recovery petition against the petitioner in Cr.M.P.No.3094 of 2017 in CF No.3415 of 2017, dated 28.07.2017, this Writ Petition is filed.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Labour appearing for respondents 1 & 2.
Admittedly, petitioner has alternate remedy of Appeal under Section 53 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1988, as such, this Court is not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition.
In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy of Appeal under Section 53 of the A.P.Shops & Establishments Act, 1988, if he is so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
08-10-2018. kvs
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.No.33278 of 2015
Date: 08.10.2018
kvs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should entertain a writ petition when an alternate remedy of appeal exists.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
1st Respondent
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
