Court disposed of two writ petitions by directing the 2nd respondent to decide pending appeals within three months. Pending this, the stay order and status quo granted earlier shall remain in force.
Direction to 2nd respondent to dispose of appeals within three months; continuation of status-quo order pending disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos 33004 of 2017 and 22595 OF 2018
COMMON ORDER :
These writ petitions are filed to dispose of the stay petition/appeal against the order in L.T.R.P.No.1 of 2013, dated 13-09-2017 passed by the 3rd respondent and this Court granted order of status-quo in WP.No.33004 of 2017. As the relief claimed in both the writ petitions is similar, both are being disposed of by common order.
Since the grievance of both parties is that the appeal is pending before the 2nd respondent and the same is not being disposed of, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioners in WP.No.33004 of 2017 and respondents 5 to 10 in WP.No.22595 of 2018 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Pending disposal of the appeal, statusquo order, dated 27-09-2017, granted by this Court in WP.No.33004 of 2017 shall continue. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
05-07-2018 NVL
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the lower court to dispose of pending appeals and maintain status-quo.
Whether to allow writ petitions filed to move in remission of stay petition/appeal.
Whether to grant extended time for disposal of appeal filed by petitioners and others.
petitioner in WP.No.33004 of 2017 and respondents 5 to 10 in WP.No.22595 of 2018
2nd respondent
3rd respondent
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
