Disposed

Smt. Vogulapu Laxmi Narsu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Feb 2018WP/3240/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition seeking declaration that the non-grant of building permission was illegal and directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's application for building permission under the Layout Regularization Scheme, 2015 within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to consider the application of building permission under the scheme within four weeks.

Smt. Vogulapu Laxmi Narsu Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.3240 of 2018

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration representing respondent No.1 and learned Standing Counsel, Sri N. Praveen Kumar, who offered to appear for respondent No.2 from the instructions and perused the prayer in the writ petition with supporting affidavit and other material on record.

¶4

The prayer in the writ petition reads as follows:

¶5

“ ……..to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering for grant of building permission for construction of residential building in open plot in an extent of 199.87 sq.yards in Sy.No.1182 of Metpally, Karimnagar District, Telangana State, as the same is not come under cut of date of Layout Regularization Scheme, 2015 as per G.O.Ms.No.151, dated 02.11.2015, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Municipalities Act and consequently direct the 2^nd respondent to grant of building permission for construction of residential building in open plot in an extent of 199.87 sq. yards in Sy.No.1182 of Metpally, Karimnagar District, Telangana State and to pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

¶6

¶7

Undisputedly, the Government of Telangana, represented by the Secretary to the Government, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, by Memo No.2252/ M1/ 2017, dated 28.04.2017, extended the LRS Scheme, 2015.

¶8

Having regard to the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider the application of

¶9

the benefit of the scheme to the petitioner, subject to fulfilment of the requirement criteria on own merits, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶10

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.

¶11

____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J

¶12

Date: 20.02.2018

¶13

Date:

¶14

Issue C.C. in three days. B/ o. pab

Smt. Vogulapu Laxmi Narsu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Vogulapu Laxmi Narsu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mattaparthi Sailaja Kumari Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Ilapuram Bhaskar Srinivas Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

M/s. R.K. Wines Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K.Malyadri Naidu Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Tummala Venkateswara Rao Vs The state Of Andhra Pradesh

Doddi Ramesh Vs the State of Telangana