The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the allegation that the respondent-Municipality was not undertaking the construction of drainage lines. No order as to costs was passed.
No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions standing closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.31754 of 2018
ORDER:
On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for respondent-Municipality that the respondent-Municipality is not undertaking the construction of drainage lines, as stated by the petitioner herein.
The same is recorded. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending consideration, if any, in this
Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_________________________
JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
Date: 19.09.2018
Smr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent-Municipality is undertaking the construction of drainage lines as alleged by the petitioner.
Whether the petitioners had an enforceable claim against the Municipality for the alleged failure to construct drainage lines.
Petitioner
Respondent-Municipality
A.V.Sesha Sai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
