From the submissions of the learned counsel and the material on record, it could be seen that in respect of subject property, petitioners filed suit in O.S.No.167 of 2008 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Tirupathi against the revenue officials, for permanent injunction and by judgment and decree dated 02.05.2018, the suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, petitioners preferred appeal in A.S.No.814 of 2018 and this court, by interim order dated 13.06.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in A.S.No.814 of 2018, granted interim injunction restraining the respondents, their men and subordinates from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the plaint schedule property for a period of four weeks and subsequently by order dated 11.07.2018, the interim injunction dated 13.06.2016 was made absolute. Now in this writ petition, petitioners are seeking for a direction to the respondents – revenue authorities not to dispossess them from the subject property. When this court in the first appeal filed by the petitioners, has already granted interim injunction, petitioners are not justified in filing writ petition for the very same relief.
