The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous on the sole ground that the impugned order challenged therein had lapsed in 2013.
No costs and dismissal of all pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.30202 of 2011
ORDER:
Sri B.V.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter, dated 23.08.2018, before the Registrar (Judicial) stating that the impugned order challenged in the W.P.No.30202 of 2011, was expired in the year 2013 itself and thereby the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. This request is also reiterated in the Court.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
_____________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
Date: 08.10.2018.
Ssv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition is maintainable given that the impugned order had already become expired and the cause did not survive for adjudication.
Petitioner
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
