Disposed

Badi Reddy Kasiviswanadham v. The Addl. Agent to the Government

Telangana HC19 Sept 2018WP/29033/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition seeking protection of land possession pending a revision petition. It directed the 5th respondent to dispose of the pending revision on merits within two months and prohibited dispossession of the petitioner until then.

What did the court decide?

Past the 5th respondent to dispose of the revision petition on merits within two months and to not dispossess the petitioner from the subject land pending its disposal.

Badi Reddy Kasiviswanadham Vs The Addl. Agent to the… — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT PETITION No.29033 OF 2008

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

The petitioner seeks writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioner from the land to an extent of Acres 5.92 cents in Survey No.53 of Pedabheempalli Village, Devipatnam Mandal, East Godavari District, pursuant to the order passed by the 1^st respondent in CMA.No.80/2005, dated 29.11.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the above mentioned land pending disposal of his revision petition filed before the 5^th respondent.

¶4

When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that against the order in CMA.No.80/2005 passed by the 1^st respondent, the petitioner preferred revision before 5^th respondent on 27.12.2008 and so far the said revision petition was not heard and the same is still pending and in spite of the pendency of the revision, the respondent authorities are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the instant writ petition.

¶5

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the view that the 5^th respondent can be directed to dispose of the revision petition within specific time and pending the revision petition, the possession of the petitioner can be protected.

¶6

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to 5^th respondent to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner before the 5^th respondent on merits within two months

¶7

¶8

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till the disposal of the revision petition, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the subject land.

¶9

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶10

___________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J

¶11

19.09.2018

¶12

Note: issue C.C. by Monday. B/o.SS

Badi Reddy Kasiviswanadham v. The Addl. Agent to the Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badi Reddy Kasiviswanadham v. The Addl. Agent to the Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fathenagar Land Colonisation Society, Vs The Govt. of Ap

Pannala Malla Reddy Vs Katla Venkanna

Sri Kameswari Type Foundry, Guntur District Vs State Bank of Hyderabad, Guntur

Shingu Hari Babu, Vs Andhra Bank

Gorantla Seshagiri Rao Vs Vijaya Bank, rep.by its Branch Manager

Koya Pullarao Vs The Manager