Chittem Srikanth v. Osmania University
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged denial of selection in BC-C seats for PhD program. University argued actual seats were fewer than minimum quota, ads closed. Petitioner deposited. Petition dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.28173 of 2018
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of respondents in not selecting the petitioner in any one of the subjects i.e. Social Work and Public Administration on BC-C quota as per his eligibility.
Sri Ch.Jagannadha Rao, learned Standing Counsel for
the respondent-University submits that for 100 seats in P.hd Course, one seat is reserved for BC-C category, but there are only 30 seats in the present case. As such, no reservation can be provided. He also submits that already admissions are over.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, no relief can be granted to the petitioner and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
24-08-2018 Nvl
2
3
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can seek admission in Social Work and Public Administration under BC-C quota given insufficient seats in the latter.
Whether the writ petition challenging the respondent university's decision to deny provision of reservation should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondent-University
Coram
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/28173/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court