guntas out of the land bearing Sy.No.69 of Hussainbagh, Old Bowenpally, Ranga Reddy district. The said suit was dismissed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy district on 17.6.2005. As against the said dismissal of the suit, the maternal grand father of the petitioner preferred A.S.No.652 of 2005 before this Court. In the said appeal, Sri S.Mahesh Kumar Goud and Sri S.V.Shankar Reddy filed A.S.M.P.No.1921 of 2005 under the provisions of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, praying for ad-interim injunction to restrain the appellant therein from making illegal construction on (6) plots of schedule property plot No.30 to 34 and Plot No.3 part of Sy.No.69 of Hussain Bagh, Bowenpally, Ranga Reddy district. This Court, by way of order dated 9.9.2015 dismissed the said application while directing to expedite the hearing of the appeal. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the schedule of property in O.S.No.181 of 2003, as shown in the decree, does not indicate the existence of any house property. Therefore, the reason assigned by the Respondent Corporation with regard to pendency of A.S.No.652 of 2005, by any stretch of imagination, cannot be a ground for rejecting the application of the petitioner.
