Petitioner challenged non-action by police on a complaint deemed civil in nature under Lalitha Kumari judgment. Court disposed of writ petition, granting liberty to avail alternative remedies.
Liberty to avail alternative remedies available; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.27293 of 2018
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondentpolice are not taking action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 26-06-2018.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home basing on instructions submits that the complaint of the petitioner was enquired into in terms of Apex Court judgment in Lalitha Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh1 and found the same to be civil in nature. It is also stated that the petitioner was also informed of the same.
Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to avail alternative remedies available to him. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
17-08-2018 Nvl
1 (2014)2SCC1
2
3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned complaint is maintainable in criminal court as per Apex Court judgment in Lalitha Kumari.
Whether the respondent police are obligated to take action on the petitioner's complaint dated 26-06-2018.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
(2014)2SCC1 / 1Referred¶4
Petitioner
Respondent Police
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
