Rathod Mangulal v. The Collector and District Magistrate
Case brief
What is this about?
Common order allowing six writ petitions that were covered by a prior judgment in W.P.No.22951 of 2014, dismissing them without further analysis.
Common order allowing six writ petitions that were covered by a prior judgment in W.P.No.22951 of 2014, dismissing them without further analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON ’ BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.Nos.22931, 22938, 22943, 22957, 22961, 27113 AND 28686 of 2014
COMMON ORDER:
When the matters are taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in all these writ petitions is squarely covered by the order of this court in W.P.No.22951 of 2014, dated 27-04-2017. A copy of the said order is placed on record. The said statement is not disputed by the learned Government Pleaders for Social Welfare and Medical and Health. The operative portion of the said order reads as under: -
“In the absence of any guidelines being prescribed with regard to the documents to be submitted showing proof of their residence in the agency area since 26th January,1950, and having regard to the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court and also in the review petition, the writ petition is allowed setting aside the order dated 14-01-2014 in RcNo.C3/ 4580/ 2012-3 and canceling the resultant notification. Further, the appointing authority shall consider the case of the petitioner, by treating him to be from agency area and finalize the matter within a period of four to six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case, the petitioner is issued with orders of appointment, this appointment shall date back from the date of which others were appointed, for the purpose of seniority, but not for the emoluments. No costs.”
Following the above said order, these writ petitions are also allowed in terms thereof. Registry is directed to enclose a copy of the above said order along with this order. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A.V.SESHA SAI , J
Date: 06.03.2018 TSNR
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.22951 of 2014, dated 27-04-2017Followed¶4
A.V.Sesha Sai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court