Common order recalling attached precedent. A batch of writ petitions challenging the legality and arbitrariness of the action of respondents in not fixing theatre admission rates were disposed of by being decided in terms of the order dated 31.10.2016 in W.P.No.19046 of 2014 and batch. Miscellanous applications stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.NOS. 20328, 20353, 20387, 24142, 24585, 26434, 29382, 29513, 31859, 32968, 33946, 36517, 39424 & 39912 OF 2015 AND 329, 505, 853, 4847, 4854, 8105, 9481, 10614, 10865, 11303, 11478, 11843, 12413, 12956, 12994, 13011, 13235, 13596, 14123, 14646, 15217, 15508, 16140, 16309, 17010, 17101, 17275, 18304, 18726, 19366, 20421, 22922, 23469, 23928, 24090, 24632, 24633, 25690, 26231, 26776, 26872, 27006, 28228, 28667 & 28678 OF 2016
COMMON ORDER
These writ petition are filed to declare the action of respondents in not fixing the rate of admission for the theatres of the petitioners’, as per their respective applications, as illegal and arbitrary.
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the issue involved in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by order dated 31.10.2016 in W.P.No.19046 of 2014 and batch.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home does not dispute the
same.
In view of the same, and for the reasons alike, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the said order.
Copy of the order dated 31.10.2016 in W.P.No.19046 of 2014 and batch, be annexed to this common order.
Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.
-------------------------------------------- A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J DATE:06—09—2018 AVS
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
