The court disposed of a writ petition challenging non-registration of a crime complaint. Upon receiving instructions that a case had already been registered, no further order was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25565 OF 2018
O R D E R :
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in not registering the crime on the complaint of the petitioner dated 20.07.2018.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced written instructions stating that basing on the complaint of the petitioner a case in Crime No.98/2018 was registered on 26.07.2018.
Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
07.08.2018 t k.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the objection to the registration of a criminal case filed by the petitioner needs to be substantively heard.
Petitioner
Respondents
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
