Disposed

Jayalakshmi Mahila Mandali, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC26 Dec 2018WP/2537/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding non-supply of essential commodities to a fair price shop, the Court disposed of the matter by directing continued supply of essential commodities to the petitioner's shop if authorization is continued post-tenure without disqualification.

What did the court decide?

No essential-specific relief granted; general holding directed supply continuation contingent on authorization renewal.

Jayalakshmi Mahila Mandali, Vs The State of Andhra… — Consumer Protection | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No. 2537 of 2017

¶3

Date : 26.12.2018

¶4

Between:

¶5

Jayalakshmi Mahila Mandali

¶6

Rep by its President A Narasamma W/o A Krishna Murthy aged about 58 years F P Shop Dealer Shop No 1182019 D No 5/1709 Geetha Ashramam Road Proddatur Town Mandal Y S R Kadapa District

¶7

Petitioner

¶8

And

¶9

The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary Civil Supplies Department Secretariat Velagapudi Amaravathi Guntur District & others

¶10

Respondents

¶11

The Court made the following:

¶12

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶13

WRIT PETITION No. 2537 of 2017

¶14

ORAL ORDER:

¶15

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies.

¶16

This writ petition is filed alleging that essential commodities are not supplied to the petitioner’s fair price shop bearing No. 1182019 D No. 5/1709, Geetha Ashram Road, Proddatur town and mandal, YSR Kadapa district, though authorization of the petitioner is neither suspended nor cancelled. This Court by order dated 25.1.2017 directed the respondents to supply essential commodities to the petitioner’s fair price shop and also granted liberty to respondents to proceed in accordance with law.

¶17

Learned counsel for petitioner informs the Court that no instructions are furnished to her whether fair price shop authorization is renewed after tenure was over on 31.3.2017.

¶18

Having regard to the same, writ petition is disposed of holding that if the petitioner’s fair price shop authorization is continued beyond 31.3.2017 and petitioner has not earned any disqualification nor his authorization is suspended or cancelled, the essential commodities shall be continued to be supplied subject to fulfillment of all other conditions. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, are closed.

¶19

__________________ P NAVEEN RAO,J

¶20

DATE: 27-12-2018 TVK

¶21

¶22

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶23

WRIT PETITION No. 2537 of 2017

¶24

Date : 26.12.2018

Jayalakshmi Mahila Mandali, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayalakshmi Mahila Mandali, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunki Reddy Venkata Ramana Reddy Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

K. Shyamalamma, Vs State of Telangana, Civil Supplies Department

V.Kishore Babu, Chittoor Dist Vs Prl Secy, Civil Supplies Dept., Guntur Dist and 3 Ot

M/s. Jyothi Electricals, Vs The Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd.

Smt. Ramaram Sujatha Vs The State of Telangana

Gondesi Pentayya , Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh