Sanivarapu Koti Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitioner challenged continuation of rowdy sheet without conviction. Court found no justification for continuation under Police Standing Orders. Permitted petition to apply to Deputy Superintendent of Police for fresh consideration in line with law.
What the court decided
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.24325 of 2015
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home, apart from perusing the entire material available on record.
This Writ Petition challenges the action of the respondents, in opening and continuing rowdy sheet No.90, dated 18.04.2007, on the file of the Station House Officer, Thallur Police Station, Prakasam District-5th respondent herein, against the petitioner herein.
According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the impugned action is highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. It is the further submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned action is also opposed to the very spirit and object of the Police Standing Orders, 601 and that there is no conviction so far against the petitioner herein and the very continuation of the rowdy sheet is impermissible under the Police Standing Orders, 601.
On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader, reiterating the contents of the counteraffidavit, deposed by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Darsi Sub-Division, Prakasam District, that, in view of the involvement of the petitioner in various crimes, it has become incumbent on the part of the respondent-police authorities to
AVSS,J W.P.No.243222225 of 015
2
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether continuation of rowdy sheet against petitioner without conviction is justified under Police Standing Orders 601.
Whether mere registration of cases without conviction warrants continuation of rowdy sheet.
Whether petitioner is entitled to approach lower authority for fresh consideration of rowdy sheet removal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Home Department
- respondent
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Darsi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/24325/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court