The court dismissed the writ petition regarding alleged unauthorized constructions, finding that the fourth respondent held valid building permission dated 10.11.2016 and the matter was closed.
No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions disposed. Writ petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.No.23421 of 2018
O R D E R:
The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is the inaction on the part of the third respondent in taking steps for stopping and removal of alleged unauthorized constructions in the subject land.
______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J
Date:05.09.2018 grk
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.No.23421 of 2018
Dated: 05.09.2018
grk
Petitioner
Municipal Corporation
Fourth Respondent
Third Respondent
A.V.SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
