M.Bheem Rao Vs The Collector and District Magistrate

THE HON ’ BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI

W.P.Nos.22931, 22938, 22943, 22957, 22961, 27113 AND 28686 of 2014

COMMON ORDER:

When the matters are taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in all these writ petitions is squarely covered by the order of this court in W.P.No.22951 of 2014, dated 27-04-2017. A copy of the said order is placed on record. The said statement is not disputed by the learned Government Pleaders for Social Welfare and Medical and Health. The operative portion of the said order reads as under: -

¶5

“In the absence of any guidelines being prescribed with regard to the documents to be submitted showing proof of their residence in the agency area since 26^th January,1950, and having regard to the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court and also in the review petition, the writ petition is allowed setting aside the order dated 14-01-2014 in RcNo.C3/ 4580/ 2012-3 and canceling the resultant notification. Further, the appointing authority shall consider the case of the petitioner, by treating him to be from agency area and finalize the matter within a period of four to six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case, the petitioner is issued with orders of appointment, this appointment shall date back from the date of which others were appointed, for the purpose of seniority, but not for the emoluments. No costs.”

¶6

Following the above said order, these writ petitions are also allowed in terms thereof. Registry is directed to enclose a copy of the above said order along with this order. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶7

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A.V.SESHA SAI , J

¶8

Date: 06.03.2018 TSNR

M.Bheem Rao v. The Collector and District Magistrate

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Bheem Rao v. The Collector and District Magistrate

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Y. S. S. P. Naidu, Vs Prl.Secy., Home dept., State of A.P.

Holy Trinity Educational Society Vs All India Council for Technical Education

S. Abdul Rahman Vs The State of andhra Pradesh

J. Sangeetha, Vs Andhra University

Golla Rajashekar, Vs Prl.Secy., Home dept., State of A.P.

M/S. Act Digital Home Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., Vijayawada Vs Prl Secy, Revenue Dept., Hyd and 6 Ot