The court disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondent police to register an FIR and take action on the petitioner's complaint, adhering to the guidelines laid down in Lalitha Kumari.
Directed the respondent police to take action on the petitioner's complaint by following guidelines in Lalitha Kumari.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.22032 of 2018
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner made complaint on 09-06-2018, but the 4th respondent is not registering the FIR on the same. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home basing on written instructions submits that the matter is pending enquiry and that they will follow guidelines laid down in the judgment of Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh1 .
In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-police to take action on the complaint of the petitioner by following the guidelines laid down in Lalitha Kumari ’s case cited supra .
As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
12-07-2018 Nvl
1 (2014)2SCC1
2
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the police to register an FIR or take action on the petitioner's complaint.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalitha KumariReferred¶4
Lalitha Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh
Petitioner
Police
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
