Dismissed

Y.Kasi Visweswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC4 Dec 2018WP/21751/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order dismissed a writ petition where petitioners challenged the 3rd respondent's attempt to dispossess them of land. The Court observed a title dispute and dismissed the petition, granting liberty to approach the Endowments Tribunal under Section 87(1)(c) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed giving liberty to approach the Endowments Tribunal; no order as to costs.

Y.Kasi Visweswara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI WRIT PETITION No.21751 of 2015

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the 3^rd respondent in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the property in an extent of Ac.1.05 cents in New Sy.No.154/R (Old Survey No.141/R) situated in Ward No.6, S.Atchyuthapuram Gram Panchayat, Suryaraopet village, Kakinada Rural, East Godavari District, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶4

The case of the petitioners is that they are in real estate business; in the year 2012, they have entered into development agreement-cum-general power of attorney with Smt. Kopisetty Ramayamma, who inherited the subject property under succession; pursuant to the development agreement, the subject property was handed over to them but the 3^rd respondent is trying to dispossess them.

¶5

Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the 3^rd respondent stating that as per the recitals in Section 43 register the institution is the absolute owner of the land measuring Ac.2.57 cts in Sy.No.79/3 situated at Sarpavaram village, Kakinada Rural and Ac..0.58 cts in Sy.No.154 (old Sy.No.141) situated at Suryaraopeta, Kakinada, totalling Ac.315 cts; the said land was leased out to one Sri Kopisetti Appanna and after his demise, his son Edukondalu was cultivating the land and he expired in the year 1997 and thereafter his wife Smt. Kopisetti Ramayamma is cultivating the

¶6

¶7

land; the institution has issued form5(1) notice under Notice No.14/2014 dated 6.5.2003 directing the Koppisetty Ramayamma to vacate the land; the said property was donated to the institution vide Document No.2416/34 dated 25.7.1934 and hence, the averment that the legal heirs of Koppisetty Yedukondalu, son of Ramayamma, have inherited the subject property under succession and purchased under registered sale deed No.2416/1934 is false and that the department has issued pattadar pass books and title deed in the name of choultry for the entire extent of Ac.1.03 cts in Sy.No.154; Smt. Koppisetty Ramayamma filed OS.No.321/2002 when the Government has proposed to acquire the land belonging to the choultry stating that she is tenant on the land and the said suit was dismissed on 6.1.2006.

¶8

It is further stated in the counter affidavit filed by the 5^th respondent that if the petitioners are disputing the title of the choultry, they have to approach the Endowments Tribunal under Section 87(1)(c) of Act 30/87 claiming right over the property.

¶9

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

¶10

As seen from the writ affidavit, the petitioners entered into development agreement in the year 2012 but the respondents are disputing the same. However, on 15.7.2015, this Court directed both the parties to maintain Status quo as on that date, which was extended from time to time upto October, 2015 and thereafter the said order was not extended. As there is dispute with regard to the title over the subject land, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the Endowments Tribunal.

¶11

¶12

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Endowments Tribunal under Section 87(1)(c) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. No order as to costs.

¶13

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶14

KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J Date: 04/12/2018 Note: CC in five days (B.O lkv

Y.Kasi Visweswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Y.Kasi Visweswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Giri Santosh Kumar. Srikakulam Dist and 3 Others Vs Prl Secy Revenue (Excise-Ii) Dept, Hyd and 4 Ot

Gen. Secy., Are-Katika Mondedar Association, Hyd and Anr. Vs Commissioner, G.H.M.C., Hyd and 3 Ot

Sri D.Nageswara Rao, Vs The State of A.P.

Bobba Sampath Kumar, Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

M.S.Venkatesh, S/o.Swaminathan, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh

K.Sandeep, S/o.K.Prabhakar Reddy, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh