Writ petition where petitioner alleged police interference in civil disputes was disposed of after the respondent denied the allegation and produced written instructions.
Petitioner's writ petition allowed based on the respondent's written instructions denying interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.20833 of 2018
ORDER:
The petitioner alleges that the 2nd respondent is interfering in civil disputes and calling them to the police station to settle the disputes with the unofficial respondents.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced written instructions on behalf of the 2nd respondent, wherein it is denied that the 2nd respondent interfered with the civil dispute and personal liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station to settle the disputes between the petitioner and respondents 4 to 7. It is further stated that the 2nd respondent never pressurized the petitioner to withdraw the Appeal No.72 of 2017.
Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
11-07-2018 Nvl
2
3
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
