Petitioner challenged appointment of Chairman of Telangana Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee without Chief Justice nomination. Court noted respondent's term ended; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.NO.19369 OF 2018
O R D E R
The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent herein has been appointed as Chairman of the 2nd respondent – Telangana Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee, without being nominated by Hon’ble the Chief Justice of High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Telangana, as per the law laid down by Apex Court in ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA1 .
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri Abshik Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3 submit that term of the 3rd respondent is over and presently he is not holding the post of Chairman of the 2nd respondent – Committee.
Recording the same, writ petition is disposed of.
Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No
costs.
---------------------------------------------------- A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
DATE:26—07—2018 AVS
1 (2003)6 SCC 697
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Islamic Academy of Education vs. State of KarnatakaExplained¶4
(2003)6 SCC 697 · Who else cites this
The Petitioner
Telangana Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee
The 3rd Respondent
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
