A two-line order disposing of a writ petition alleging police interference in civil land disputes. The Court accepted that police registered crimes but did not summon petitioners beyond that.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.18969 of 2018
ORDER:
The petitioners allege interference of respondents 3 and 4 in civil disputes regarding Plot Nos 60 and 61 belongs to the petitioner No.1 and Plot No.40 of petitioner No.2 in Sy.No.29/A of Parvathapur Village, Peerajdiguda Municipality, Medipally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District and summoning them to settle the same with respondents 5 and 6.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced written instructions stating that basing on the complaints of the petitioners dated 25-05-2018, two crimes have been registered. It is further stated that the police are not interfering with the civil disputes and they have not summoned
the petitioners except registering the crimes.
Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
02-07-2018 Nvl
2
3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interference of police in alleged civil land disputes warrants a writ remedy.
Whether the petitioners have been summoned by the police against their alleged complaints.
Petitioners
Respondents 3 and 4
Respondents 5 and 6
A RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
