Petitioner's counsel submitted the writ petition was infructuous with an endorsement recorded accordingly. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed pending miscellaneous petitions. No order as to costs.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No.18930 of 2010
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous, and he also made an endorsement to that effect.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. The miscellaneous petitions pending in this Writ Petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J 01.10.2018 vs
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
