Dismissed

M/s. Aditya Traders v. The Chairman, Arbitration Tribunal

Telangana HC1 Feb 2018WP/1843/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.1843 of 2018 filed by M/s. Aditya Traders challenging arbitration proceedings. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail other legal remedies, and accordingly closed the injunction application.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to seek other legal remedies.

M/s. Aditya Traders Vs The Chairman, Arbitration Tribunal — Arbitration | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.1843 of 2018

¶3

Date: 01.02.2018

¶4

Between : M/s. Aditya Traders

¶5

… Petitioner

¶6

And The Chairman, Arbitration Tribunal, Telangana Paper Merchants’ Association, M.G. Road, Secunderabad and others.

¶7

… Respondents

¶8

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER : Sri Singam Srinivasa Rao, for Sri K. Koteswara Rao

¶9

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS :

¶10

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

CVNR,J & GSP,J

W.P.No.1843 of 2018

ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy)

¶15

This writ petition is filed for the following relief:

¶16

“…. to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in constituting the Arbitration Board and Proceedings in Arbitration Case No.1 of 2017 before the Chairman, Arbitration Tribunal for Telangana Paper Merchants Association, Secunderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, contrary to the By-laws of the Telangana Paper Merchants Association and rules made thereunder with regard to arbitration and in gross violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the Arbitration Proceedings in the Arbitration Case No.1 of 2017 before the Chairman, Arbitration Tribunal for Telangana Paper Merchants Association, Secunderabad, and pass such other order or orders ….”

¶17

Sri Singam Srinivasa Rao, Counsel, representing Sri K. Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his client to avail any other appropriate legal remedy available under law.

¶18

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to

¶19

3 CVNR,J & GSP,J W.P.No.1843 of 2018

¶20

the withdrawal of the writ petition, I.A.No.1 of 2018 shall stand

¶21

closed.

¶22

__________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

¶23

____________________________ GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J 01.02.2018. Msr

CVNR,J & GSP,J

W.P.No.1843 of 2018

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.1843 of 2018

¶29

01.02.2018 Msr

M/s. Aditya Traders v. The Chairman, Arbitration Tribunal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Aditya Traders v. The Chairman, Arbitration Tribunal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed MD Vs Chief Secy., Gun., and 3 Others

Nerella Prabha Latha, Warangal Dist. Vs the State of Ts.,Genl.Admn.,Hyderabad,and 2 Otrs.

M. Parvathi, Chittoor Dist Vs Chief Secy, Guntur Dist and 3 Others

Vijay Kumar George Bernard Vs Gullipalli Sumalatha and Another

Sri Sama Suresh Reddy, Vs M/s.Raja Rajeswari Properties Private Limited

P H Krishna, Nellore Dist Vs N v L Kalyani, Nellore Dist