A single judge dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution on 14.12.2018. The petitioner was repeatedly absent despite multiple adjournments and the matter being listed for final orders.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTI CE KONGARA VI JAYA LAKSHMI Writ Petition No.17121 of 2009
Order :
Earlier on two occasions i.e., on 15.11.2018 and 26.11.2018 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner in spite of listing the matter under the caption “for orders”. Thereafter, the matter underwent two adjournments at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Again, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 13.12.2018, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today also, when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioner nor is there any representation made on his behalf.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_____________________________ KONGARA VI JAYA LAKSHMI , J.
Date: 14.12.2018 Nsr
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTI CE KONGARA VI JAYA LAKSHMI
Writ Petition No.17121 of 2009
Date: 14.12.2018
Nsr
Petitioner
KONGARA VI JAYA LAKSHMI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
